Get Started for Free Contexxia identifies hard-to-find pieces of information in SEC filings. No more highlighters, no more redlining, no more poring over huge documents. CHINA SECURITY & SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (1260625) 10-Q published on Jul 25, 2011 at 8:38 am
Pending the closing of the Merger, the Merger Agreement also restricts the Company from engaging in certain actions without Parents consent, which could prevent the Company from pursuing opportunities that may arise prior to the closing of the Merger. Any delay in closing or a failure to close could have a negative impact on the Companys business and stock price as well as the Companys relationships with its customers, vendors or employees, as well as a negative impact on the Companys ability to pursue alternative strategic transactions and/or the Companys ability to implement alternative business plans. In addition, if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, the Company is required to pay a termination fee of up to $10,000.
CHINA SECURITY & SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars
(Except for share and per share amounts)
As discussed below, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger on April 20, 2011 which was amended and restated on May 3, 2011 (the Merger Agreement) under which our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Tu Guoshen has agreed to acquire all of our outstanding common stock for $6.50 per share in cash, subject to the certain exceptions and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement (the Merger). All forward-looking statements in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations do not include the potential impact of the Merger Agreement or the transaction contemplated thereunder. In addition, any forward-looking statements relating to the Merger are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including uncertainties as to the timing of the Merger, the possibility that alternative acquisition proposals will be made, the possibility that alternative acquisition proposals will not be made, the possibility that various closing conditions for the Merger may not be satisfied or waived; the possibility that Parent and Merger Sub will be unable to obtain sufficient funds to close the Merger; the failure of the Merger to close for any other reason, the amount of fees and expenses related to the Merger, the diversion of managements attention from ongoing business concerns, the effect of the announcement of the Merger on our business relationships, operating results and business generally, including our ability to retain key employees, the Merger Agreements contractual restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the completion of the Merger, the possible adverse effect on our business and the price of our common stock if the Merger is not completed in a timely manner or at all, and the outcome of any legal proceedings, regulatory proceedings or enforcement matters that have been or may be instituted against us and others relating to the Merger.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, our Installation Segment generated revenues of $118.05 million and $129.35 million which represented 75.5% and 76.8% of our total revenues, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, our Installation Segment generated revenues of $197.79 million and $222.10 million which represented 77.5% and 76.9% of our total revenues, respectively. This decrease in revenues was mainly because a fewer number of projects were completed during the first and second quarter of 2011 as compared to the same periods in last year. More of our installation projects were in progress at June 30, 2011. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, three customers contributed to more than 10% of our revenue with each accounting for approximately 36.7%, 21.0% and 13.0% of our revenue, respectively. There was no individual customer that accounted for more than 10% of our revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, two customers contributed to more than 10% of our revenue with each accounting for approximately 40.7% and 14.6% of our revenue, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, one customer contributed to more than 10% of our revenue which accounted for approximately 14.5% of our revenue.
On May 23, 2011, plaintiffs counsel in Musto v. China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 6418-CS, filed a motion with the Court of Chancery of the state of Delaware seeking to consolidate five of the pending actions and to have counsel for Mr. Musto appointed as lead plaintiffs counsel in the consolidated action. On May 27, 2011, the Company, members of the special committee, Terence Yap, and Merger Sub, respectively, filed motions to dismiss the remaining action that was not part of the consolidation motion, Jamal v. China Security & Surveillance Technology, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 6408-CS. On June 7, 2011, four plaintiffs (Levine, Smith, OConnor, and Jamal) filed a joint Amended Complaint containing substantially the same allegations and seeking substantially the same relief as the prior complaints. The joint Amended Complaint was accompanied by a motion for preliminary injunction to block the merger and a motion to expedite discovery. On June 10, 2011, plaintiffs counsel in the Dziak, Levine, Smith, OConnor, and Jamal actions filed a joint cross-motion to the Musto consolidation motion. The joint cross-motion also sought consolidation of all pending actions, but requested that the law firm of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. be appointed as lead plaintiffs counsel in the consolidated action. At a hearing on June 30, 2011, the Court ordered that the six pending cases be consolidated and appointed Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. as the lead plaintiffs counsel in the consolidated action. A hearing on plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction in the consolidated action is scheduled to occur on August 16, 2011.
There are risks and uncertainties associated with our proposed Merger with Rightmark Holdings Limited and Merger Sub.
As previously announced, we have entered into the Merger Agreement providing for the acquisition of the Company by Parent, an entity formed and wholly owned by our CEO and chairman Guoshen Tu . Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. There are a number of risks and uncertainties relating to the Merger. For example, the Merger may not be consummated or may not be consummated in the timeframe or manner currently anticipated, as a result of several factors, including, among other things, the failure of one or more of the Merger Agreements closing conditions, Parents failure to obtain sufficient financing to complete the Merger, or litigation relating to the Merger. In addition, there can be no assurance that approval of our stockholders will be obtained, that the other conditions to closing of the Merger will be satisfied or waived or that other events will not intervene to delay or result in the termination of the Merger. If the Merger is not completed, the price of our common stock may change to the extent that the current market price of our common stock may reflect an assumption that the Merger will be consummated.