Get Started for Free Contexxia identifies hard-to-find pieces of information in SEC filings. No more highlighters, no more redlining, no more poring over huge documents.
In addition, as a result of the Merger, uncertainty around future employment opportunities, facility locations, organizational and reporting structures and other related concerns may impair our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. If employee attrition is higher than expected due to difficulties encountered in the integration process it may adversely impact our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger. While we have put in place certain incentives designed to retain key personnel in connection with the Merger, these incentives may not be sufficient to achieve their desired purpose and only extend to a limited population that may not include personnel whose services are important to achieving key organizational objectives.
More generally, if we do not hire, train, motivate and effectively utilize employees with the right mix of skills and experience in the right geographic regions and for the right offerings to meet the needs of our clients, our financial performance could suffer. For example, if our employee utilization rate is too low, our profitability and the level of engagement of our employees could decrease. If that utilization rate is too high, it could have an adverse effect on employee engagement and attrition and the quality of the work performed, as well as our ability to staff projects. If we are unable to hire and retain a sufficient number of employees with the skills or background needed to meet current demand, we might need to redeploy existing personnel, increase our reliance on subcontractors or increase employee compensation levels, all of which could also negatively affect our profitability. In addition, if we have more employees than necessary to serve client demand with certain skill sets for certain offerings or in certain geographies, we may incur increased costs as we work to rebalance our supply of skills and resources with client demand in those geographies.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. However, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. There can be no assurance that all control issues or fraud will be detected. In connection with the Merger and as the combined company continues to grow its businesses, its internal controls will become more complex and will require more resources for internal controls. Additionally, the existence of any material weaknesses or significant deficiencies would require management to devote significant time and incur significant expense to remediate any such material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and management may not be able to remediate any such material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in a timely manner. The existence of any material weakness in the combined company’s internal control over financial reporting could also result in errors in its financial statements that could require the combined company to restate its financial statements, cause it to fail to meet its reporting obligations and cause stockholders to lose confidence in its reported financial information, all of which could materially and adversely affect the combined company and the market price of its common stock.

The completion of the Merger was conditioned upon the receipt by HPE and CSC of opinions of counsel to the effect that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Merger will qualify as a "reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code (the "Merger Tax Opinions"). The parties did not seek a ruling from the IRS regarding such qualification. The Merger Tax Opinions were based on current law and relied upon various factual representations and assumptions, as well as certain undertakings made by HPE, HPES and CSC. If any of those representations or assumptions is untrue or incomplete in any material respect or any of those undertakings is not complied with, or if the facts upon which the Merger Tax Opinions are based are materially different from the actual facts that existed at the time of the Merger, the conclusions reached in the Merger Tax Opinions could be adversely affected and the Merger may not qualify for tax-free treatment. Opinions of counsel are not binding on the IRS or the courts. No assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions set forth in the Merger Tax Opinions or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the Merger were determined to be taxable, previous holders of CSC common stock would be considered to have made a taxable disposition of their shares to HPES, and such stockholders would generally recognize taxable gain or loss on their receipt of HPES common stock in the Merger.

As of March 31, 2017, we owned or leased numerous general office facilities, global security operations centers, strategic delivery centers and data centers around the world totalizing approximately 8.4 million square feet. Locations which house three or more of these types of usage are referred hereto as co-locations. We believe all of the properties we own or lease are well-maintained, suitable and adequate to meet our current and anticipated requirements. Upon expiration of our leases, we plan to exit low utilization and sub-scale locations to optimize our data center footprint and increase site density. As part of the expected synergies from the Merger, we plan to increase co-location and decrease our occupancy footprint by approximately 30%. Lease expiration dates range from fiscal 2018 through fiscal 2028. Our corporate headquarters is a leased facility located at 1775 Tysons Blvd, Tysons, VA 22102 and is included in the Washington, D.C. area of the square footage in the table below. The space being utilized by our GIS and GBS segments and Corporate is approximately 48%, 26% and 2%, respectively. In addition, approximately 24% is being utilized by both the GBS and GIS segments.

Companies acquired during each reporting period are reflected in the results of the Company effective from their respective dates of acquisition through the end of the reporting period. The Company allocates the fair value of purchase consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed generally based on their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquired entity is recorded as goodwill. If the Company obtains new information about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to the Company's consolidated statements of operations. For contingent consideration recorded as a liability, the Company initially measures the amount at fair value as of the acquisition date and adjusts the liability, if needed, to fair value each reporting period. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration, other than measurement period adjustments, are recognized as operating income or expense. Acquisition-related expenses and post-acquisition restructuring costs are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred.