Get Started for Free Contexxia identifies hard-to-find pieces of information in SEC filings. No more highlighters, no more redlining, no more poring over huge documents.
Upon the issuance of the Refinanced Secured Notes on April 15, 2015, the Company issued to CPPIB Credit Investments III Inc. (the “Purchaser”) a warrant to acquire 700,000 shares of Holdings’ common stock, with an exercise price equal to $9.88 per share, representing a 30% premium to the volume-weighted average price of Holdings’ common stock for the ten trading days prior to the issuance of the warrant. The warrant was valued at approximately $2.2 million using a modified Black-Scholes model and was accounted for as a debt discount, unamortized portion of which was subsequently written off upon redemption of the Refinanced Secured Notes. The warrant was not impacted by the May 9, 2017 redemption of the Refinanced Secured Notes and expires on the sixth anniversary of the date of issuance. The number of shares issuable pursuant to the warrant and the warrant exercise price are subject to adjustment for stock splits, reverse stock splits, stock dividends, mergers and certain other events.

We evaluate matters and record an accrual for legal contingencies when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount or range of the loss can be reasonably estimated in accordance with ASC 450. We evaluate legal contingencies at least quarterly and, as appropriate, establish new accruals or adjust existing accruals to reflect: (1) the facts and circumstances known to us at the time, including information regarding negotiations, settlements, rulings, and other relevant events and developments; (2) the advice and analyses of counsel; and (3) the assumptions and judgment of management. Legal costs associated with our legal proceedings are expensed as incurred. We currently have no accrued liabilities for outstanding legal matters.
Given there are procedural, factual, and legal issues to be resolved that could significantly affect our assessment as to the probability of liability, we are not able to reasonably estimate the size or range of the possible loss, if any, with respect to these legal proceedings.

Oneeb Rehman, et. al. v. Everi Payments Inc. and Everi Holdings Inc., is a putative class action matter pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Ft. Lauderdale Division filed on October 16, 2018. The original defendant was dismissed and the Company was substituted as defendant on April 22, 2019. Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, alleges that Everi Payments Inc. (“Everi Payments”) and the Company have violated certain provisions of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA). Plaintiff seeks an award of statutory damages, attorney’s fees, and costs. 

Mat Jessop, et. al. v. Penn National Gaming, Inc., is a putative class action matter filed on October 15, 2018, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. Everi Payments was added as a defendant on December 21, 2018. Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, alleges that Penn National Gaming, Inc. (“Penn National”), has violated certain provisions of FACTA, and that Everi Payments has been unjustly enriched through the charging of service fees for transactions conducted at Penn National facilities. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief against both parties, and an award of statutory damages, attorney’s fees, and costs.  

NRT Technology Corp., et. al. v. Everi Holdings Inc., et. al., is a civil action filed on April 30, 2019 against the Company and Everi Payments in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging monopolization of the market for unmanned, integrated kiosks in violation of federal antitrust laws, fraudulent procurement of patents on functionality related to such unmanned, integrated kiosks and sham litigation related to prior litigation brought by Everi Payments (operating as Global Cash Access Inc.) against the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, trebled damages and injunctive and declaratory relief.