Get Started for Free Contexxia identifies hard-to-find pieces of information in SEC filings. No more highlighters, no more redlining, no more poring over huge documents.
Third, we announced the sale of many of our Datacom transceiver module products to Cambridge Industries Group (“CIG”). This transaction closed on April 18, 2019. For further information regarding this transaction, refer to “Note 5. Business Combination”. We expect Datacom transceiver sales to ramp down to zero during fiscal year 2020. We are investing in new Datacom chip development and expect sales of these chips to customers serving the Datacom and 5G wireless markets will grow over time. With the exit from the business of selling Datacom transceivers, we recorded an impairment charge of $30.7 million to our Long-lived assets that were not deemed to be useful, as they were retired from active use and classified as held-for-sale. These assets were valued at fair value less cost to sell. We also recorded inventory write down charges of $20.8 million related to the decision to exit the Datacom module and Lithium Niobate product lines in our cost of goods sold of consolidated statements of operations. These actions do not qualify as discontinued operations for disclosure purposes as they do not represent a strategic shift having a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. For additional information, refer to “Note 15. Impairment Charges”.

Our significant accounting policies are those that affect our financial statements materially and involve difficult, subjective or complex judgments by management. We believe that of our significant accounting policies described below, certain accounting
policies involve a greater degree of judgment and complexity and are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our consolidated financial statements. These policies are inventory valuation, revenue recognition, income taxes, long-lived asset valuation, business combinations, and goodwill. During fiscal year 2019, we removed valuation of derivative liability from the list of critical accounting policies and estimates due to the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock to common stock on November 2, 2018. Refer to “Note 12. Non-Controlling Interest Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Derivative Liability” for more details. For a description of our critical accounting policies, also refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.

Our Series A Preferred Stock was considered a participating security where the holders of Series A Preferred Stock had the right to participate in undistributed earnings with holders of common stock. On November 2, 2018, the remaining 35,805 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock were converted into 1.5 million shares of our common stock. Refer to “Note 12. Non-Controlling Interest Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Derivative Liability” for further discussion. Prior to conversion, the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to share in dividends, on an as-converted basis, if the holders of our common stock were to receive dividends. Up through the date of conversion, we used the two-class method to compute earnings per share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. In determining the amount of net earnings to allocate to common stockholders, earnings are allocated to both common and participating securities based on their respective weighted-average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated similar to basic earnings per common share except that it gives effect to all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period, using the treasury stock method.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2017-13, ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-20 and ASU 2019-01 (collectively, Topic 842). The new guidance generally requires an entity to recognize on its balance sheet operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets. The new guidance contained in Topic 842 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those periods, with early adoption permitted. The standard is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2020 and provides an optional transition method that allows entities to apply the standard prospectively, with any cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption. We will adopt the new standard using this optional transition method. We have elected the practical expedients to not reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs for contracts that existed prior to adoption date. We have also elected to combine lease and non-lease components and to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off the balance sheet and recognize the associated lease payments in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We expect to recognize operating lease right-of-use assets between $90.0 million to $100.0 million and operating lease liabilities between $80.0 million to $90.0 million on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of the date of adoption, June 30, 2019. The difference between the operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities primarily represents the existing asset recognized in relation to the favorable terms of an operating lease acquired through a business combination offset by our deferred rent balances. Our accounting for finance leases is not expected to change substantially from the legacy Topic 840. Other than disclosed, we do not expect the new standard to have a material impact on our remaining consolidated financial statements.

Our Series A Preferred Stock was considered a participating security where the holders of Series A Preferred Stock had the right to participate in undistributed earnings with holders of common stock. On November 2, 2018, the remaining 35,805 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock were converted into 1.5 million shares of our common stock. Refer to “Note 12. Non-Controlling Interest Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Derivative Liability” for further discussion. Prior to conversion, the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to share in dividends, on an as-converted basis, if the holders of our common stock were to receive dividends. Up through the date of conversion, we used the two-class method to compute earnings per share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. In determining the amount of net earnings to allocate to common stockholders, earnings are allocated to both common and participating securities based on their respective weighted-average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated similar to basic earnings per common share except that it gives effect to all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period, using the treasury stock method. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the more dilutive of the treasury stock method or the if-converted method.